On Friday April 7 was released in Spain " V for Vendetta " and that there was a servant to the session tramp, to enjoy what has been touted as "the latest from the Wachowski brothers " (although the director is James McTeigue) , you know, the parents of the trilogy Matri x .
With those credentials, it is not surprising that half the audience left the room disappointed and half snoring sound issued during the pass, only interrupted by comments like "often pain in the ass, and runs" or "this is a mess, I miss Neo" . And is that " V for Vendetta
"is not an action movie where the quality is limited to a very sophisticated special effects.
I am of the opinion that the Wachowski were wrong giving birth to triplets and had to be limited to maintain an only child: (Enter) The Matrix . The aftermath - Reloaded and Revolution - are infumables: aesthetics have been created, they will have a bunch of geeks, dressed up in black leather coats and sunglasses, invade cinemas and let themselves absurd salaries in merchandising , but not cease to be a shit film detracts from the genius of the primal (shit that the undersigned has swallowed a few times ; what Politeness does not hot and just be confessed).
So to " V for Vendetta " was predisposed to boredom, and even to yawn, why not say, ill milk. I guess the same thing for waiting longed so disappointed those who left the cinema: a comic hero, a beautiful brat give him the reply and action, lots of action, all wrapped up in a poor script left in diapers what might have been a good argument and millions of fireworks design (sorry, I ie special effects) . But, oh miracle, it appears that this time the Wachowski have not devoted simply to raise cash . All expect a commercial product that will do well to invest their money in something else, because they go around the shots, although they exist. So that we understand, has little or nothing to do with these monsters roll Marvel (Spiderman, Daredevil and substitutes).
"V for Vendetta" is based on the comic of my admired Alan Moore and David Lloyd. According to the magazine Frames, Alan Moore wanted to disengage from the project because previous adaptations of his work ("From Hell" and "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen") did not give good results, or what is the same : They were two terrific shit. According to the same magazine, Mr. Moore "has not been at all satisfied with the adaptation, he says, is an apology of terrorism, something totally out of his pacifist ideals " . Where it says" peace "the Wikipedia -more accurately, in my opinion," says "anarchist".
Honestly, I do not see it. Although the late-night sessions , given my advanced age, cause they use the bottles of water to wet my face and not to quench thirst, think at any point in the film I close my eyes and against what Frames says he thinks
Alan Moore I v i not justify terrorism anywhere, but a movie full of messages that invite reflection. However, as everything in life will depend on the eyes that look, of course.
In any case, I have not ever seen a film that does justice to the novel / comic on which it is based.
To get in a situation, here's the synopsis ( WARNING: cuidadin, afraid of spoilers ):
"The story happens in the future (2039), Britain has become in a totalitarian state. V has a superhuman strength as a result of a monstrous medical experiments conducted by the government, this strength gives a rare skill for combat, extraordinary intelligence and a cruel sense of humor , skills using creative ways to manipulate media, official killed in numerous ways and blow up buildings with explosives. At the beginning of the film rescues a young woman named Evey from government thugs who were going to rape and murder and she becomes his right hand below the subjected to cruel and liberating experience to help you understand their point of view.
V is rated for its terrorist enemies , wears a mask of Guy Fawkes , a revolutionary who sought to destroy a bomb the English Parliament in 1605 and assassinate King James I England. V starts a revolution when a November 5 launches two bomb attacks on London monuments and takes control of radio frequencies handled by the government, asking his fellow citizens to rise up against oppression and tyranny. In the televised V vows to destroy within a year the Parliament building and the people expected to join you for that date. "
And to settle the gut, here's the trailer , I've acquired a taste for this from YouTube :
In short, we have a totalitarian government, manipulative, torturer, murderer and torturer who terrorizes the masses to ensure that they yield their liberties in pursuit of security (will anyone familiar?. For much you sound, the original comic is from the 80's, so very wrong must be the world right now to acquire the same effect.) On the other hand we have a guy who tortured the same government, which becomes the avenger and uses the same weapons (manipulation, murder and torture) to combat it. It is true that the aims pursued by the type in question, are noble. It is true that the aims pursued by the government, are evil. The question is, are they not equal the media? Are they justified in terms of the nobility of purpose to be achieved?. Who just see "V" a hero, in my opinion is very shortsighted. As he deduced that the film makes apology terrorism. The idea being conveyed is much more complex than that.
Natalie Portman , who plays Evey, sums it up pretty well: "V for Vendetta questions the definition of terrorism that occurs in the dictionary. I it's funny how we tend to distinguish good from violence violence bad. Why such a distinction be head? If in times of Nazi Germany, someone had to blow up Hitler, I am sure that today would be considered a hero by the history books. But honestly, I do not find what moral difference between an American soldier fighting for his country and a suicide bomber ready to give their lives to defend their cause. There are very few people who are not violent at some time or situation. There are very few people who if they saw their children would not use threats of violence. Unless you realize that all the reasons are personal and can not judge the reasons of others, come to the conclusion that all violence is illegitimate. Actually, you can not be non-violent in a violent world, otherwise you extinguished.
Indeed, Hugo Weaving (the famous Agent Smith of Matrix and Elrond in The Lord of the Rings "), makes" V ". Difficult role for the challenge of being able to convey something, permanently hidden behind a rigid mask. And the truth is that the uncle away.
As curiosities, to say that there have been gilipollescas reactions of all kinds: that if you show sympathy towards homosexuality, if discrediting the Catholic Church because one of the characters is an archbishop pedophile if so, if that ... Nonsense. To me, music and all, I liked.
POPULATION
SHOULD NOT FEAR THE GOVERNMENT ... THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD FEAR THE PEOPLE
0 comments:
Post a Comment