Today in various parts of the world, as every year, the Global Marijuana March, known in Spain as the Million Marijuana March aimed at claim the normalization of marijuana and cannabis, or whatever it is, demand an end to the ban. According to the FAC (Federation of cannabis) , fines for implementation of the Public Safety Act have arrived with the PSOE, a figure never reached before, nearly 175,000, so that acts of May 6, users seek the cessation of misapplication of the Public Safety Act and the reauthorization of this law, such and as demanded by the Socialist Party was in opposition when , demand seems to have forgotten since it seized power in general elections.
The fact is that the other day with a colleague has msn and more stupid, which is how many conversations
arise, just talking about drugs. The issue arose when the INDIVIDUAL 2 (omit real names and nicknames of the participants in an obvious matter of respect) said, quote, not having ever tasted "hard drugs", an event to which this individual 1 reacted by jumping into the jugular GUY 2-hehehehe, what exageraílla am-:
[12:53:02]
GUY 1: it is hard drugs?
[12:53:08]
GUY 1:
defines
[12:53:13]
GUY 2: uf, YaST
[12:53:15]
GUY 1: we start now with the double
moral
[12:53:24]
GUY 1: or is drug or not is
and from this basis, I fully concur with the position of individuals 1, with one exception: the fact that I did not understand certain distinctions, does not mean that he thinks "committing an error, in my opinion- use them, it does necessarily exercising a double standard. The double standard is the one who pulls the strings, enforcing the prohibition and promoting misinformation by the demonization of certain substances and sacred or at least, the social acceptance of other equally or more harmful than those that are bent on demonization, double standards is that of governments, multinational corporations (which the end of the day are which govern the world) and media (serving the previous two, mostly). The ordinary people, rarely makes use, at least consciously, no double standards on this issue, simply repeating the slogans that have been bombed during a lifetime, repeated lies that both assume as true . As the teacher, or Antonio Escohotado , " with respect to the man in the street, a large number of people believe sincerely hope that the drug is a real entity, and must fend off such a thing as a robber or a murderer " . That explains the strange and the pair so widespread practice to distinguish between soft drugs and hard drugs. This explains why those who cling to that distinction, not entering any substances that both bags were prescribed by doctors. And it has endowed the term "drug" as a pejorative nature, at the height of inconsistency, come to expect us to believe that drugs should be considered different medications. The reality is that regardless of the name you want to give, regardless of acquisitions prescription at a pharmacy on its own initiative or on the black market, there is no difference between a Trankimazin or a Valium and a striped or farlopa pasti. Like it or not, all is dope. And anyone who says otherwise is lying. The difference is not conceptual, not ended, nor should it be found not in danger (if agreed to legalize illegal drugs), but in any case, in use, namely, therapeutic and hedonistic. And having nothing wrong, that does not, no matter who despite the consumption-leisure, it is inconceivable that made up the ass of Prozac or sleeping pills, because it has prescribed a simple family doctor who told him that lately tad declined or were you not seem to sleep well there is not frowned upon, while a shiver to make a night out in any nightclub, you have to hide in a toilet, lest you Crunch a fine of fifty papers .
[12:54:20]
GUY 1: there is only one thing that is drug and should not be
[12:54:23]
GUY 1:
marijuana
[12: 58:38]
GUY 3: So that marijuana is not a drug ...
[12:58:46]
PERSON 3: I'll take you and talking to God
[12:58:49]
GUY 3: and you tell me
[12:58:52]
GUY 3: if drug or drug not
[13:00:08]
GUY 1: marijuana is not fatal in any case
[13:00:20] INDIVIDUAL
1: very beneficial effects for health
[13:00:30]
GUY 1: and his addiction is much to discuss
Feeling much individual 1, for me marijuana is a drug. I admit that its toxicity is minimal, I admit it is impossible to overdose death, but drug is simply because the cannabis is psychoactive , ie affecting the operation of the brain to a greater or lesser extent depending on the amount of THC it contains. As for addiction, I doubt that there is a physical dependence but psychological self. At least I know people with clear signs of having this unit, which does not use any other drug.
Anyway, never understand why the anti-prohibitionists focus its efforts exclusively on cannabis or why the only opening to "legality" that raises the government is related to therapeutic purposes.
Just as I do not consider valid in other areas, argument that "it's better than nothing," seems to me equally absurd on drugs.
"We have drug prohibition. Legalizing drugs sounds so foolish as to legalize the taste for painting, walking and reading. You can not legalize a human activity that is a civil right immemorial."
drugs have been around since man exists. And the man takes drugs from existing drugs, or forever. With some drugs companies do business and states (alcohol, snuff, drugs). Do business with other gangs, drug traffickers. And do business with most all (how is that control narcos States integers!). What happens is that most of these businesses are on hand and on the margins of legality, which he finally gets hurt is the consumer, who gets even remotely substances are composed of what is supposedly buying. As damaging as snuff and the snuff is not in itself, but the poisons that loaded with tobacco, the most dangerous drugs are the cuts that are added, including an intermediary and facilitator, to reach the consumer's hands. And since human beings continue getting high and because public health is, theoretically, a value essential to protect not understand why not legalize everything and to hell the bike. Ment, I understand, but the reasons are as bastards who can not even be considered.
U national law as the prohibition of drugs, which aims to defend ourselves, is a usurpation and a nonsense, pure corruption of law. Let's say the ban has had the positive effect of generating civil disobedience, which serves to give us the feeling and the certainty that we are not subjects that we are citizens ".
not go to list the typical and topical anti-prohibitionist arguments (to end the mafia, with a very important part of economy, reduce crime, ensure quality ...), well known by everyone. Nor do I use the "logic" of those who have experienced personally or in the nearest field, the problem of addiction. Advancement and that I've lived a lot closer than I would have liked and therefore no one appears to criminalize the substance. And in that sense I refer to what he narrates Escohotado in "Letter to the Mother of an addict" .
What is the argument that the drug makes us irresponsible and dangerous to other citizens? " is a self-fulfilling prophecy of drug inquisitor. Until the ban, which begins in the United States in the early twentieth century, there was virtually no concept of unwitting victim of drugs. Since the ban which put thousands of doctors and pharmacists to jail who would not bow to executive orders, created some people who live in this alibi. A drug hours give you an alibi for not nothing at all to be a shit with your family, your friends and others. You're a liar, you're a dreamer, but who you have given the arguments and the basis for behaving well have been the banned drugs and gave them the slogan of demonic monsters ".So far, the response of the Government Delegate National Drug Plan is not waiting, so that has made today some ridiculous statements about legalization groups claiming organizers of today's levels you can read HERE . am that Jartita Ms Carmen Moya and other related bugs, take the liberty to decide on my health amen to pretend they care about something. A different matter is that the demo that are held often end up many times, such as carnivals. And so hard to be taken seriously.
"Drugs are wonderful because they open the mind, make you see that the truth does not exist, everything is relative. The drug gives you another perspective, another dimension, makes you see that nothing is what seems that nothing is. The only reality is your reality and be what you're able to see. When the time comes you do not be afraid to try them, you are a lucid, you're smart, you have a duty to do so. Just do not never lose control. While the controls you there is no danger, you do not them control you. "
Eusebio Poncela in Martin (Hache).
" The reason for taking drugs is
to know yourself. They must be taken
wanting to himself, respected and, of course, respect for others. "
Antonio Escohotado.
(Citations red, are Antonio Escohotado)
0 comments:
Post a Comment