Monday, March 19, 2007

Does Ringworm Have A Lump

SPANISH SOCIETY OF ROBBERY



Video by

http://www.cadenapeco.com

In line with two entries published today in Escolar.net , I'm dedicating it to my dear friends SGAE. That Mr Teddy Bautista, President of lways S G year A ome E uros , complains in New Spain , that the first result that shows the famous search engine Google , when you type the word "thieves" are the initials of "SGAE" saying "That is impunity. What would happen if you type out journalists and sausages?. On the one hand, it is fascism. accusations without evidence and take advantage of impunity is exactly what the absolutist rulers. What would happen if it goes on the cover of your newspaper? Well, I invoke the Rule of law. Why impunity, English law is not like in the rest of Europe? If that happens in France, the operator responsible is provided by this portal and deeply regret not being able "go against Google as it is the law. In Spain where more networks of pedophiles are caught. It is as if the newsagent selling child pornography and could not be brought in court. Many people are shocked when I say this. Warned that piracy is a matter of mafias and organized crime and branded me everything. "

In view of such events, I wonder ... is it not normal that "Cross out all"? And what kind of guy mug is able to complain of impunity that he uses? Mr. Bautista you know what the G oogle B ombing ? And I answer, the first question, yes, it is normal to the second, which should be one with the face harder than concrete and the third no, or not interested.

Let's talk, impunity, Mr. Bautista. Talk about lies. Talk about scams. Let's talk about theft. And talk about fascism and absolutist rulers. And it takes two to talk, I will stick their own words. That does not say that I invented nothing.

Analyzing what the website says SGAE on private copying find the following:
U
No particular user not have to seek permission of author / s of a musical work or audio each time you record it for his own use and not to be subject to business. But this reproduction is authorized by law, produces a compensatory remuneration for private copying , which is also regulated in Article 25 of the Property Law Intellectual and is intended to compensate for the loss of income to holders of a musical audiovisual such possibility of making copies for private use. is obvious that every time you make a copy of a disk for private use is allowed to sell a copy of it, so must somehow compensate the owners of the works contained therein, for the income foregone.

I will forgive you but how do you say? what is obvious why? face I have a millionaire? "or just an asshole?" is swallowed me "And when I say, tell the neighbor to the fifth, Camata the bar, Currito office or any ordinary person who does not have the purchasing power of Alejandro Sanz, to take the first example that comes to my head would have bought each of the discs that I copied in my 31 years of life, not being able to make these copies? Ja, ja and ja. Paradoxically, this "obvious" so very obvious, leaving the mouth of honey from a guy who says " The debate over the price of the discs is demagogic and Manichean" when he raised the possibility of lowering them as alternative to a problem? of piracy. Of course, no hint of demagoguery and / or Manichaeism in his particular conception of the term "obvious." You have to fuck.

time ago I wrote about a blanket Senegal to top-selling lashing material of this type (which you can read HERE) . In Case I instructions manual I found that the court expert valued at no less than 300 euros, EACH CD containing a film that has not yet been marketed for home use, that is, every movie recorded directly from a cinema or extracted from a promotional copy (commonly known as screener). Well, the justification for this outrageous valuation expert that, in the absence of further market each of these films for home use, the only way of acquiring an individual is buying directly from the distributor and the saber that you would get into such case, oh compulsive moviegoer impatient, would range between 250 and 400 euros. And back to the same thing: how many people would spend that dough if you do not have a mantero to sell it for 5 or 6 euros? Does anyone of us here know the quality of a screener downloadable on the Internet? Do I have to agree convinced when I measured at 300 like shit eurajos "anything"? "I really think that by buying it at mantero'm depriving the owner of the work of those same 300 eurajos ? Does anyone in their right mind can believe that I would certainly clunkers as "Coyote Ugly" or "Bad Boys 2 " but leave me free? When I say yes, I bite, I swear. Here stood a servant Bowling ( expression made in Tamaruca ) when he heard such an aberration from the lips of court expert. What happens is that saying "go and bugger you" in front of a judge, a prosecutor, a lawyer for Paramount, Sony and another from one of the SGAE, seriously jeopardizes the physical integrity and can lead few now, what we're going to cheat.

"Internet is a threat or a release, depending on how you use it. Sgae is your reference and the helping hand that you bring to the best of the networks and help you avoid the risks of globalization because work for culture, culture of all that makes us equal in our diversity, respecting differences and assumes the mixture, which makes us more tolerant and also more effective in defending our rights, your rights " (From Eduardo Bautista message in the web SGAE).
l I imagine a culture that makes us equal in our diversity should be the culture of the canon for notice it does not matter if you buy blank CDs to make a private copy of a movie and or a disc, if it is to record details of your own creation, you pay as y. .. What greater equality in diversity there than that?.


If they're right, dammit. We foolish criminals, proponents of mules thieves, citizens lack of civility, we do not realize the damage they do to art, to culture, the country. Invaluable is the economic damage caused to all these poor people. I guess then this news bring to the fore today Escolar.net , is a fallacious lie : " SGAE breaking his own record revenue . One thing more that got away from Teddy Bautista in the interview with The New Spain . According to forward its chairman, SGAE entered "only" 320 million euros in 2005. They are "only" 20 million more than the previous year , which was the record of this management entity. You see, the crisis is terrible. "

Pa piss and take no drop. Not to mention The Cake CD .




(Illustration by Pedro Vera).


EDIT: more information,

http://www.internautas.org/

http://www.elastico.net/archives/005194.html

http://www.rebelion.org/cibercensura/030801lobo.htm

http://www.rebelion.org/cibercensura/030801lobo.htm

http://www.rebelion.org/cibercensura/030722bravo.htm

http://www.rebelion.org/cultura/030909titiriteros.htm

http://www.rebelion.org/cibercensura/030912rib.htm

http://filmica.com/david_bravo/

http://inciclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/SGAE


EDITED ( 2):
Above is to swallow the media spin. It is scandalous


Http://www.filmica.com/david_bravo/archivos/003452.html

http://www.escolar.net/MT/archives/2006/04/miedo_policial.html

http://www.filmica.com/david_bravo/archivos/003457.html

0 comments:

Post a Comment