
I do not think Mr. Frank Miller need presentation. Without wishing to get biblical 'd say you know his work and if you do not know, I recommend you augment your libraries with some of her graphic novels because it really worthwhile. You can find some information about his life and miracles HERE and HERE .
I think anyone who has enjoyed the comic, can deny that the film is played by almost frame by frame. In case anyone wants to look at it and though an issue in pdf format can never be comparable with the printer, you can download it HERE .
This is because after reading many reviews absurd Filmaffinity ( "film of blood, boobs and vigorexia" , "uplifting film of a people who killed children and imperfect to have such noble men and male as those who delight in the empty film " or " is not movies, are just a lot of special effects and beauty mixed with video game violence ") the icing I have found today in an article in Juan Villoro to El Periódico de Catalunya . Although he acknowledges that Zack Snyder achieves a formidable comic adaptation of the famous Miller , thereupon stated that the biggest mistake of the film consists precisely in being too faithful to the "cartoon" that gives rise. Send carallo is that that was it!. If the director wanted to shoot a peplun the use or remake "The Lion of Sparta" (they say was the work of Miller's reference to creating 300), the result would have been another very different, but certainly not an adaptation, kept to the millimeter, the comic in question. In my opinion, Villoro far as to lose his temper when it abounded in statements such as "saber, arrows, blood and declared perceived homophobia in the film by Zack Snyder (eing?)," Rarely has the human body as fillet " (Ie. .. not what he has seen little film for you if 300 is the pinnacle of violence?), "Festival of jerky and double standards, 300 proposes a curious version of heroism: the honor keeps you learned that war is bad for health "(should use the obituaries war movies such as snuff packages? viewers are not able to discern for themselves by themselves, what is good and bad? are stupid ass to those who must lead, illustrious oh enlightened?. No Comments.
To top it off, it appears that several Iranian government officials have described the film as an attack on the culture of their country . An attack that indigenous press has come to cross a "declaration of war." But then, as we have (as I like to say "we"!) To Mr. Aznar that Islam expects apology for occupying Spain for eight centuries in the same way that the Catholic Church, having so many different grounds for criticizing "The Da Vinci Code", put the outcry about the lack of historical accuracy of a work of fiction-and I stress that last word, to see if we're finding out, "unfortunately there are people who abuse the hallucinogens are offenses in a film which has more suction than to entertain.
The greatest merit of 300, ahead even of achieving its objective of entertaining and bringing a comic to the big screen with a fidelity never seen until now (and only comparable to that once gave Sin City comic book of the same name author), is that it is a feast for the senses with unparalleled visual beauty. Blood was never so aesthetics. Never the harshness of battle resembled both a ballet.
is because film is not necessarily always an exercise in deep thinking . Although 300 enclose the message of "better to die standing," not moralizing attempts to transmit or cause reflection of the viewer. There are many ways of making art. And in that sense, I would mention another movie recently seen: "Tetsuo: The Iron Man" , which does not even have an argument and it's all pure visual impact. But as I saw the smoke, for now I'll shut up and just let me here a link to trailer and one on the cyberpunk genre . And also goes HERE more reasonable criticism by far to date I have read 300.
LHH REPORTS: of the proliferation of e-mails asking about the subject, say that yes, Mr. Buko have plated the space without notice or deadline for withdrawal. .. something was removed?. Bukoland2 Closing has been the ultimate consequence of expressing how I feel about the topic of the blogosphere in my previous entry. It does not really ready to learn from one who has been the adoption of this democratic measure. Then, yes, will do a lot of nice sea campaigns for freedom of Spaces, against censorship of the Code Conduct and all those broods. But in the back, are misuses of the Code in question and if you do not like what you think, I nail her. From here, only three words for them with my utter contempt: Fuck you. This is, of course, for bigots, for those who are in a strange house flooding everything with its venom, for which van de Robin Hood but surreptitiously slip the loot in their pockets, for the ignorant conviction, for who think that diversity of opinion is a threat to those who believe they can insult all chichirimundi without being insulted. The garbage, carrion. And who sits mentioned, let him.